In the 1600s, there was a…
Most people are at least skeptical about the idea that medical biotechnologies can extend healthy human lifespan by preventing age-related illnesses primarily through rejuvenating the body. Even those who believe that these therapies are possible are not convinced they are a good idea. Most people use a limited number of arguments to support their position. The arguments used can be adapted easily to argue against medicine which is already available and from which the majority of the world’s population currently benefits.
Would people who accept these arguments against rejuvenation also accept them as valid objections towards \”normal\” medicine How many people today would agree with these two people who lived in the 1600s?
Did you hear anything about John’s child?
Source:
https://www.leafscience.org/meanwhile-in-the-1600s/
